2021年3月9日


Hotline Between Two Koreas: Status, Limitations and Future Tasks

Revised March 6, 2021

Seung-chan Boo
Chung-in Moon

Contributors

Seung-Chan Boo is a spokesperson for the ROK Ministry of National Defense. He co-authored this article as a research fellow of the Institute for North Korean Studies, Yonsei University, before he joined the ministry.
Chung-in Moon is the Chair of the Sejong Institute, vice-chair of the APLN and a distinguished university professor of Yonsei University. He served as special advisor to the ROK President for Unification, Foreign and Security Affairs (May 2017- Feb. 2021).

Abstract

The Korean conflict has been one of the most protracted in the world, lasting more than 70 years. Despite the heightened tension, there was no channel of communication between the North and the South. It was only on September 22, 1971, that the first hotline between the two Koreas was installed at the Panmunjom—26 years after the telephone line between Seoul and Haeju was cut off by the former Soviet army immediately after liberation on August 26, 1945.
Since 1971, a total of 50 lines were open, including a hotline between leaders of the two Koreas as well as military and intelligence communication lines. But North Korea suddenly cut off all communications with the South with the exception of that between the United Nations Command (UNC) and North Korea military. Nevertheless, they proved to be useful tools for confidence-building measures to improve inter-Korean communication, to facilitate exchanges and cooperation, including inter-Korean official talks, and to assist the promotion of humanitarian aid. More importantly, they have served as an effective mechanism for the prevention of accidental military clashes through a timely exchange of information. This paper presents a brief historical overview of hotlines between the two Koreas, examines their present status, and elucidates limitations and future tasks.

Keywords
The Korean conflict, confidence-building measures, inter-Korea hotlines, Cata-links.

NOTE: RECNA publishes this paper as a special Working Paper with a permission from the Nautilus Institute.

Full text (PDF) is here.
 

Category TOPICS
2021年3月3日

It is published simultaneously by RECNA-Nagasaki University, Asia Pacific Leadership Network for Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament (APLN), and Nautilus Institute and is published under a 4.0 International Creative Commons License the terms of which are found here.


The DPRK’s Covid-19 Outbreak and its Response
SHIN, Young-jeon
 
A Working Paper presented to
The 75th Anniversary Nagasaki Nuclear-Pandemic Nexus Scenario Project

About the Author

Shin, Young-jeon, is a professor at the Department of Preventive Medicine at Hanyang University School of Medicine, Seoul Korea. He is the Chief Editor of Health and Social Welfare Review and a Board Member of the Academy of Critical Health Policy and the Korean Association of Preventive Medicine.

Abstract

On January 25, 2020, the DPRK shut down its border, switched to a state-run emergency quarantine system, organized a pan-ministerial organization, the Central People’s Committee for Health (CPCH), and established emergency command centers for epidemic response (ECCER) in provincial, county, and Ri-levels. Until now, it has continued to take the strongest Covid-19 quarantine measures in the world, including restricting cross border and regional movement.

The DPRK responded swiftly and strongly to past major outbreaks such as SARS (2002-2003), measles (2006-2007), swine flu (2009-2010), Ebola (2013-14), and MERS (2015), as well as the periodic outbreak of typhoid fever, cholera, etc. In response to the coronavirus outbreak, the DPRK drew on its experience to implement aggressive measures such as border blocking, strengthening disinfection, and quarantine, as in response to past large-scale epidemic threats.

Keywords
Covid-19 response, DPRK, South Korea, China, Inter-Korean relations, quarantine, case-surveillance, food security

Full text (PDF) is here.
 

Category TOPICS
2021年1月22日

Research Center for Nuclear Weapons Abolition, Nagasaki University (RECNA) issued “RECNA’s Statement on the Entry into Force of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) on January 22, 2021.

>> for details

>> RECNA’s EYE

 

Category TOPICS
2021年1月13日

Server migration of the institutional repository “NAOSITE” has been finished and our articles has become available from JAIRO Cloud. All articles in the “NAOSITE” are accessible through IRDB.

Following the server migration, we have renewed the links on the web pages below on our site.

RECNA Newsletter
RECNA Policy Paper

Not all links on our site have been checked and renewed. Please try the IRDB if there are any problems on the links on our site.

Contact E-mail: recna_staff@ml.nagasaki-u.ac.jp

When you send enquiries to RECNA by e-mail, please be sure to write your name in the e-mail. Otherwise, we might not be able to reply. Thank you for your understanding.
 

Category TOPICS
2021年1月6日

Due to server migration, the Institutional Repository “NAOSITE” is temporarily not accessible from off-campus. Our articles under the categories below are now unavailable from there. Please wait a little longer, as we are planning to reopen the repository on a different server (JAIRO Cloud) in January. We apologize for the inconvenience and thank you for your cooperation.

RECNA Newsletter
RECNA Policy Paper
• RECNA Annual Report
• RECNA Conference Paper
• RECNA Lecture Paper
• RECNA Research Paper / Report

Contact E-mail: recna_staff@ml.nagasaki-u.ac.jp

When you send enquiries to RECNA by e-mail, please be sure to write your name in the e-mail. Otherwise, we might not be able to reply. Thank you for your understanding.
 

Category TOPICS
2020年12月23日

Vol.3, Issue 2 of Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament (J-PAND) is now available online. There are 15 open access articles.

For the issue, see here. The special feature is about “The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) at Fifty” and “The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW): Towards the First Meeting of States Parties.”

The contributions of RECNA staff include:

Kurosawa, Mitsuru (RECNA advisor). 2020. “The US Initiative on Creating an Environment for Nuclear Disarmament.Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament 3(2): 283-298.
https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2020.1834802

Kulacki, Gregory (RECNA visiting fellow). 2020. “Nuclear Weapons in the Taiwan Strait Part I.Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament 3(2): 310-341.
https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2020.1834963

Kulacki, Gregory (RECNA visiting fellow). 2020. “Nuclear Weapons in the Taiwan Strait Part II.Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament 3(2): 342-365.
https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2020.1834962
 

Category TOPICS
2020年12月18日


Hotline Between Two Koreas: Status, Limitations and Future Tasks
Chung-in Moon
 
Prepared for Workshop on Hotlines
August, 2020
Convened by the Nautilus Institute, the Institute for Security and Technology, and the Stanley Center for Peace and Security

Introduction

In this paper, Moon Chung-in provides historical context on the hotlines linking South and North Korea and points to the lessons that can be learned from the decades-long effort.

A podcast with Moon Chung-in and Philip Reiner can be found here

Moon Chung-in is a distinguished professor emeritus of political science at Yonsei University.

It is published simultaneously here by Asia Pacific Leadership Network, here by Institute for Security and Technology and here by Nautilus Institute and is published under a 4.0 International Creative Commons License the terms of which are found here.

Acknowledgments: Maureen Jerrett provided copy editing services.

The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Nautilus Institute. Readers should note that Nautilus Institute seeks a diversity of views and opinions on significant topics in order to identify common ground.
Banner image is by Lauren Hostetter of Heyhoss Design.

NOTE* RECNA publishes this paper as a special Working Paper with a permission from the Nautilus Institute.

Full text (PDF) is here.
 

Category TOPICS
2020年12月17日


Lessons from COVID-19 for Tackling Global Existential Risks

A new report by the Asia Pacific Leadership Network, Nautilus Institute and RECNA explores new ways to think about addressing nuclear weapons in a world re-shaped by the COVID-19 pandemic

New analysis by the Research Center for Nuclear Weapons Abolition, Nagasaki University (RECNA), the Asia-Pacific Leadership Network for Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament (APLN), and Nautilus Institute for Security and Sustainability, explores how the far-reaching impacts of COVID-19 and future pandemics could alter the landscape for nuclear risk and disarmament.

In less than a year, the global pandemic has exposed how in an interconnected world states can lack the capacity and political will to effectively manage a public disaster. The new report identifies future scenarios, challenges and opportunities for governments, civil society, and market actors to reduce existential risks, including nuclear risks, in Northeast Asia. The findings are the culmination of a series of scenario planning workshops imagining highly uncertain future conditions and generating a series of “robust actions” that if taken today would ensure that states and societies are better prepared for future risks.

Full text of the report (PDF) is here.
 

Category TOPICS
2020年12月14日

It is published simultaneously by RECNA-Nagasaki University, Asia Pacific Leadership Network for Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament (APLN), and Nautilus Institute and is published under a 4.0 International Creative Commons License the terms of which are found here.


Hope Becomes Law:
The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in the Asia Pacific Region
Richard Tanter
 
A Working Paper presented to
The 75th Anniversary Nagasaki Nuclear-Pandemic Nexus Scenario Project

About the Author

Richard Tanter is a Senior Research Associate at the Nautilus Institute and teaches international relations at the University of Melbourne. He is immediate past president of the Australian board of the International Campaign Against Nuclear Weapons (ICAN).

Abstract

The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons will enter into force in January 2021, but has a long way to go towards institutionalisation and its intended impact on the dominant presumption of legitimacy and utility of nuclear weapons. Dialogue on the treaty on the treaty in the Asia-Pacific region faces a suite of issues regarding movement of the treaty towards institutionalisation as a regime. The effectiveness of regional dialogues will be affected by the following:

• the TPNW as rebellion against global nuclear hegemony;
• decisions regarding proposals of basing dialogue about the TPNW on a claimed primacy of the Non-Proliferation Treaty;
• debates about the path forward: stigmatisation vs. devaluing and delegitimating nuclear weapons;
• the critical counterfactual: Can we imagine a Threshold Nuclear Disarming State?
• debates on Nuclear Supporting States and Extended Nuclear Deterrence;
• obstacles to treaty compliance posed by globally distributed systems of nuclear command, control, and communication;
• a universal human interest in having in place by the time a Threshold Nuclear Disarming State appears a comprehensive verification regime which will be ‘fit for purpose’ in the circumstances that will prevail at that point; and the importance of the inclusion of Pacific island states in dialogue about the TPNW.

Full text (PDF) is here.
 

Category TOPICS
2020年12月3日

Video Release Announcement

We are pleased to announce that we have uploaded a video of Special Symposium to Commemorate the 75th anniversary of the Nagasaki Atomic Bombing: “Peace and Disarmament Education in an Emerging Era of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons”. (November 25).

in addition to the delay in the start of this Zoom transmission, we have encountered problems where the audio in Japanese was not transmitted for about 20 minutes on that day.

Again, I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience these troubles have caused. Your kind understanding and patience are highly appreciated.

Fumihiko YOSHIDA
Director, RECNA


Program

Part1:  Special Lecture
“The Origin of War and the Future of Humanity”

  Juichi YAMAGIWA, the 26th President of Kyoto University
 
Part2:  Panel Discussion  (Names below with * are online participants.)
“Peace and Disarmament Education in the New Era”
  Moderator:
  Mikiko NISHIMURA*, Professor, International Christian University
Panelist:
  Valere MANTELS*, Head of the United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA) Vienna Office
  Toshiaki SASAO*, Director, Peace Research Institute, International Christian University (ICU-PRI)
  Kiho YI*, Director, Center for Peace and Public Integrity, Hanshin University, ROK
  Keiko NAKAMURA, Associate Professor, RECNA


Zoom Live Stream

Date:  November 25, 2020
Time:  6 p.m. - 8:30 p.m. (JST), 10 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. (CET)
Language:  English or Japanese (with simultaneous interpretation)
Venue:  NBC Video Hall (Nagasaki City)
Organizer:  Research Center for Nuclear Weapons Abolition, Nagasaki University (RECNA)
cooperation:  Peace Research Institute, International Christian University (ICU-PRI)

 

Category TOPICS

1 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 22

このページのトップへ

月別アーカイブ

  • 対話プロジェクト
  • nu-nea_project2021-2023
  • 北東アジアの平和と安全保障に関するパネル(PSNA)
  • J-PAND
  • RECNA図書
  • 「被爆の実相の伝承」のオンライン化・デジタル化事業ウェブサイト
  • YouTube共通チャンネル
  • 世界の核弾頭データ
  • 世界の核物質データ
  • ニューズレター
  • ポリシーペーパー
  • レクナの目
  • Monitor BLOG
  • 市民データベース
  • 核兵器廃絶長崎連絡協議会
  • ナガサキ・ユース代表団
  • RECNAアクセス